-
Website
http://alistairpott.com -
Original page
http://alistairpott.com/2008/01/11/nuclear-power-is-good-it-has-an-unfair-reputation/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
marykaoosthuizen
1 comment · 1 points
-
alistairpott
9 comments · 1 points
-
axxo
1 comment · 1 points
-
cahofmeyr
1 comment · 1 points
-
vidyut
1 comment · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
units
measurments
stuff!!!!
Anyway, the units are actually included on the graph just under the sub-title (Grams of carbon equivalent per kWh). Basically, how much carbon is emitted per unit of electricity generated.
Advantages:
- No greenhouse gases are emitted (practically no emissions)!
- Over the lifetime of a nuclear power plant the cost of generating electricity is very low
- The technology exists already and is remarkably safe
- Nuclear power generation is consistent. You don’t rely on the sun or the wind.
Disadvantages:
- Nuclear power generation depends on fuels like Uranium which will eventually run out. That said, we have enough of these fuels (and we can improve their usage efficiency) to last a very long time.
- Generating nuclear power generates radioactive waste that must be carefully and expensively dealt with. Compared to the negative effects of other power generation (including solar and to a certain extent wind) a pile of radioactive material that must be carefully handled is nothing.
- Building a nuclear power plant is very expensive. That means that it takes time before you make a profit on a new nuclear power plant. But over time nuclear power generation is actually cheap.
Spent fuel is indeed a problem and possibly an expensive one. However, including this cost does not make nuclear power prohibitively expensive.
Most importantly nuclear power is a lesser of evils. It is not even close to perfect, but it’s better than almost all of our current alternatives.
Relatively safe (far less damaging than coal power generation) when properly regulated, relatively cheap, relatively green. Sure you have to take care of spent fuel, but that is something that we can do.
In the long term I believe some sort of solar power generation will be our best option - right now I believe that nuclear power generation is our best option.
Lastly, we need to more vigorously explore a process to reverse U238 to U235 (U235 being stable) there by reducing even further the waste that is so problematic.
This is misleading because of the
1) cost of plant construction (you have to figure that in, industry does that is a big reason they don't build them.
2) cost of storing waste over its self life must be figured in (how long will it have to be stored? 1000s of years, that will be expensive