<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>alistair.pott - Latest Comments in When being special means nothing &amp;#8211; the Anthropic Principle</title><link>http://alistairpott.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://alistairpott.disqus.com/when_being_special_means_nothing_the_anthropic_principle/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:16:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When being special means nothing &amp;#8211; the Anthropic Principle</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2007/08/24/when-being-special-means-nothing-the-anthropic-principle/#comment-2386448</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You are assuming, without proof, that only our universe is relevant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That seems a reasonable assumption except that it means that only universes populated by life are relevant.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">alistair</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:16:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When being special means nothing &amp;#8211; the Anthropic Principle</title><link>http://alistairpott.com/blog/2007/08/24/when-being-special-means-nothing-the-anthropic-principle/#comment-2386447</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nope, that definition is only in effect if we assume without proof that probabilities and other possible universes are even relevant.  Otherwise, the evidence indicates that we are somehow specially relevant to the physical structuring of the universe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">island</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 10:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>